© Neuronpedia 2026
    Privacy & TermsBlogGitHubSlackTwitterContact
    Neuronpedia logo - a computer chip with a rounded viewfinder border around it

    Neuronpedia

    Jacobian LensNEW
    Natural Language
    Autoencoders
    NEW
    Assistant AxisNEWCircuit TracerUPDATESteerSAE EvalsExportsinterp-engineNEWAPI Community BlogPrivacy & TermsContact
    1. Home
    2. Qwen3.5-4B
    3. 15-RES-MATRYOSHKA-65K
    4. 22183
    Prev
    Next
    INDEX
    Explanations

    - "name": "name"- "name": "name"- "name": "name"- "name": "name"Analysis:The `MAX_ACTIVATING_TOKENS` list shows tokens like "EN" (from Enron), "langle" (from mathematical expressions), and "-". The `TOKENS_AFTER_MAX_ACTIVATING_TOKEN` shows things like "RON", "-n", "ER", "0", "n", "+". This suggests the neuron might be sensitive to characters and sequences that are part of names, internal identifiers, or mathematical/code-like structures.The `TOP_POSITIVE_LOGITS` include words like "plorer", "bull", "rov", "/AFP", "Dr", "aim". These are varied, but some hint at people, entities, or possibly error/special notations.The `TOP_ACTIVATING_TEXTS` contain:1. Email headers with "Enron@ENRON", "Tony Pryor", "Paul Cherry", "Ted Chavez". This points to internal company communication, names, and email addresses.2. Code snippets like `autofill.json?f=&name=", function(data) { ... zFormError("#newchannel-name-feedback",data.error); ... }`.`"${MAX_ACTIVATING_TOKENS[0]}"`, `"${MAX_ACTIVATING_TOKENS[1].lower()}"`, `"${TOKENS_AFTER_MAX_ACTIVATING_TOKEN[1]}"`**: Seems to be related to internal company codes like 'Enron' and 'ECT', and potentially names or identifiers within those systems.Let's re-evaluate based on the *specific* request for the explanation format.The user wants a *single phrase*, 3-20 words, explaining what the neuron detects/predicts.Current lists:MAX_ACTIVATING_TOKENS: EN, OT, langle, -, {, 2TOKENS_AFTER_MAX_ACTIVATING_TOKEN: 0, RON, -n, ER, ", x, 0, n, +TOP_POSITIVE_LOGITS: plorer, bull, rov, %D, %A, çĩ, /AFP, edr, Dr, aimTOP_ACTIVATING_TEXTS: Emails with Enron, names, code snippets with 'name', mathematical expressions involving '$a \in \mathbb{R}$', '$x_n$', '$\langle x_n \rangle$', probabilities, JSON snippets with 'name': 'name', 'id': 'id'.Focusing on the strongest signals:- `EN`, `RON`, `ER` in `MAX_ACTIVATING_TOKENS` and `TOKENS_AFTER_MAX_ACTIVATING_TOKEN` point strongly to "Enron".- `langle`, `a \in \mathbb{R}`, `x_n`, `n`, mathematical symbols (`+`) in texts and tokens suggest mathematical/symbolic expressions.- `name` in JSON and code suggests data fields or variable names.- `/AFP`, `Dr` in logits might relate to entities or specific roles.Combining these hints:The neuron seems to react to text related to `Enron`, `mathematical variables/expressions`, and `data field names`.Let's try to find a unifying pattern.The prompt implies the neuron is *finding patterns in lists*.The TOP_ACTIVATING_TEXTS list contains several distinct domains:1. Enron emails (structured text, names, dates, addresses)2. Mathematical expressions (variables, symbols, sequences)3. JSON/code snippets (key-value pairs, variable names)If the neuron detects "patterns in lists", it might be looking for sequences that are *common in such structured or semi-structured data*.Let's re-examine MAX_ACTIVATING_TOKENS and TOKENS_AFTER_MAX_ACTIVATING_TOKEN again.`EN`, `RON`, `ER` -> Enron`OT` -> could be part of 'other' or a token artifact.`langle` -> mathematical notation, often part of sequences like $\langle x_n \rangle$.`-` -> common in dates, alphanumeric codes, separators.`{` -> braces, common in code, JSON, math.`2` -> number.`0`, `-n`, `ER`, `"`, `x`, `0`, `n`, `+` -> common character sequences in code, math, identifiers.The `TOP_POSITIVE_LOGITS` are a bit scattered:`plorer` (explorer?), `bull` (stock market?), `rov` (part of words?), `%D`, `%A` (format specifiers?), `çĩ` (unicode?), `/AFP` (news agency?), `edr`, `Dr` (titles, names).Given the instruction "You are explaining the behavior of a neuron in a neural network. Your response should be a concise explanation (3 to 20 words) that captures what the neuron detects or predicts by finding patterns in lists."The key is "finding patterns in lists". The lists are `MAX_ACTIVATING_TOKENS`, `TOKENS_AFTER_MAX_ACTIVATING_TOKEN`, `TOP_POSITIVE_LOGITS`, `TOP_ACTIVATING_TEXTS`.The neuron seems to be sensitive to:- Specific keywords/sequences like "Enron".- Mathematical notation elements like angle brackets, variable notations (`x_n`), greek letters.- Code/data structure elements like braces `{}` and key names like "name".- General alphanumeric sequences and common symbols that appear in structured text.Perhaps the neuron is detecting *structured text markers* or *identifiers within structured data*.Let's look for a common theme that can be phrased concisely.- `Enron` emails- `Mathematical expressions`- `JSON snippets with 'name'`- `Code snippets`These are all forms of *structured data*. The tokens `EN`, `RON`, `ER`, `langle`, `{`, `-`, `name` are all part of such structures.structured data identifiers and sequences

    np_acts-logits-general · gemini-2.5-flash-lite
    New Auto-Interp
    Top Features by Cosine Similarity
    Configuration
    decoderesearch/qwen-3.5-saes/qwen-3.5-4b
    Prompts (Dashboard)
    16,384 prompts, 128 tokens each
    Dataset (Dashboard)
    monology/pile-uncopyrighted
    No Configuration Found
    Embeds
    IFrame
    Link
    Not in Any Lists

    No Comments

    Negative Logits
    erweise
    -0.07
    isan
    -0.06
    Õ»
    -0.06
    \"",
    -0.06
     gradi
    -0.06
    hati
    -0.06
    åĿĽ
    -0.06
    instead
    -0.06
    ánh
    -0.06
     ngh
    -0.06
    POSITIVE LOGITS
    plorer
    0.06
    bull
    0.06
    rov
    0.05
    %D
    0.05
    %A
    0.05
    çĩ
    0.05
    /AFP
    0.05
    edr
    0.05
    Dr
    0.05
    aim
    0.05
    Activations Density 0.007%

    No Known Activations