© Neuronpedia 2026
    Privacy & TermsBlogGitHubSlackTwitterContact
    Neuronpedia logo - a computer chip with a rounded viewfinder border around it

    Neuronpedia

    Jacobian LensNEW
    Natural Language
    Autoencoders
    NEW
    Assistant AxisNEWCircuit TracerUPDATESteerSAE EvalsExportsAPI Community BlogPrivacy & TermsContact
    1. Home
    2. Olmo-3-1025-7B
    3. 16-RES-MATRYOSHKA-65K
    4. 2629
    Prev
    Next
    INDEX
    Explanations

    "virtually" followed by terms of totality.Essentially: "virtually" + "all/everything/every/universally".The positive logits (identical, perfect, flawlessly, exactly, impossible, guarantee) also reinforce the idea of totality or completeness.Let's look for a concise phrase (3-20 words).The pattern is "virtually" + a word indicating completeness/all-encompassing.Possible phrases:- virtually all/everything/every- virtually + term of completeness- totality with "virtually"- near totalityLet's check the rules:- Concise (3 to 20 words): Yes.- Single word, phrase, or pattern: Yes, a phrase.- About tokens following or preceding: Yes.- About words starting with a sequence: Not directly, more about what follows.- Avoid simply listing tokens: Yes.- Find patterns: Yes.- No phrases like "words related to", "concepts related to", "variations of the word": Yes.- Do not start with "This neuron detects/predicts": Yes.- Do not mention "tokens" or "patterns": Yes.- No capitalization unless proper noun: Yes.- Specific: Yes.- Majority match: "virtually" is dominant, and the following words are all related. The positive logits also support this.Considering the input, the core pattern is "virtually" followed by something that signifies entirety."virtually all/everything/every" is a good summary."virtually" + term of total scope."virtually" plus universal scope.Let's try to combine the idea.The phrase "virtually everything" or "virtually all" appears frequently. The positive logits support the idea of completeness.How about describing the *quality* it detects when "virtually" is present.It's not just "virtually", it's "virtually" in the context of "everything/all/every".The top positive logits are "identical", "perfect", "perfectly", "flawless", "exactly". This suggests the neuron is sensitive to absolute or near-absolute states.When "virtually" (from MAX_ACTIVATING_TOKENS) is combined with words like "every", "everything", "all", "universally" (from TOKENS_AFTER_MAX_ACTIVATING_TOKEN), it forms phrases that imply near-totality or universality.So, the neuron seems to detect this specific combination.Let's consider the examples in TOP_ACTIVATING_TEXTS:- virtually every American state- virtually everything we know- virtually all post-transplant B cell proliferative disorders- virtually universally acknowledged- damn near everything (similar to virtually everything)- virtually in every post-transplant patient- virtually every industrial plant- virtually every recent CPU- just about every other kid (similar to virtually every)- virtually nearly as good (this one is a bit different, "nearly as good" isn't total, but "virtually nearly" amplifies the "nearly")The core seems to be "virtually" + a quantifier of totality.A concise explanation could be:"virtually" followed by totality words"virtually" + all/every/everythingnear universalitynear totalityLet's look at the positive logits again: "identical", "perfect", "perfectly", "flawless", "exactly". These words themselves represent totality or absence of deviation. The neuron might be looking for phrases that *imply* these states, often qualified by "virtually".So, the pattern is "virtually" + a quantifier (every, all, everything) which together suggests a near-perfect or total state.How to phrase this concisely?"virtually" with universal scope"virtually" signifying totalitynear universal scopeLet's simplify. The most striking pattern is "virtually" followed by words like "every", "everything", "all", "universally". This combination conveys a sense of near-completeness."virtually" + total quantifiers"virtually" + universalityWhat if the explanation is just what the neuron *represents*? The positive logits suggest perfect/flawless/exact. The activation texts show "virtually" qualifying these perfect/total statements.So it's detecting instances that are *almost* perfect or *almost* total."near totality" captures this well."near universality" also works.Let's re-check the TOP_POSITIVE_LOGITS. If these are the *most likely words associated with this neuron*, it implies the neuron is fundamentally about "perfect", "flawless", "exact", "guarantee", "impossible".However, the MAX_ACTIVATING_TOKENS are overwhelmingly "virtually". This means the neuron is firing *most strongly* when "virtually" appears.This implies it's not just general "perfection", but "virtually perfect" or "virtually total".The combination of "virtually" and the following words is key.So, the pattern is "virtually" followed by words indicating completeness."virtually" plus total quantifiers."virtually" plus words of entirety."virtually" followed by "all" or "every"."virtually" + scope of totality.Let's go with a phrase that directly states the connection observed."virtually" + word of totality."virtually" + total scope.Considering the positive logits (perfect, flawless, exactly), the neuron seems to be responding to qualifiers that make absolute statements almost true.* "virtually" + "everything" -> almost everything (near totality)* "virtually" + "every" -> almost every (near totality)* "virtually" + "all" -> almost all (near totality)* "virtually" + "universally" -> almost universally (near totality)Thus, the neuron detects "near totality" or "near universality".Let's make it more concrete based on common input.The most common sequence is "virtually every" or "virtually everything".How about:"virtually" followed by "every" or "everything"This is too literal.The core concept is the *amplification* or *qualification* of totality."virtually" is a qualifier. The following words are quantifiers of totality.Let's try to capture the *meaning* or the *implication*.The presence of "virtually" when predicting words like "perfect" or "flawless" suggests 'almost perfect'.The presence of "virtually" when followed by "every" or "all" suggests 'almost all/everything'.This neuron appears to recognize the concept of near-completeness or near-universality.The question is to make it less abstract."virtually" followed by comprehensive terms."virtually" with comprehensive terms.Let's look again at TOP_POSITIVE_LOGITS: identical, perfect, perfectly, flawless, Perfect, Perfect

    np_acts-logits-general · gemini-2.5-flash-lite
    New Auto-Interp
    Top Features by Cosine Similarity
    Configuration
    decoderesearch/olmo-3-saes/olmo-3-1025-7b
    Prompts (Dashboard)
    24,576 prompts, 128 tokens each
    Dataset (Dashboard)
    monology/pile-uncopyrighted
    No Configuration Found
    Embeds
    IFrame
    Link
    Not in Any Lists

    No Comments

    Negative Logits
    bek
    -0.10
     inward
    -0.08
    -more
    -0.08
    chia
    -0.07
    ational
    -0.07
    ulen
    -0.07
    -thirds
    -0.07
     Opposition
    -0.07
    kr
    -0.06
    anno
    -0.06
    POSITIVE LOGITS
     identical
    0.15
     perfect
    0.13
     perfectly
    0.13
     flawless
    0.13
     Perfect
    0.12
    Perfect
    0.12
     exactly
    0.12
     immediately
    0.12
     impossible
    0.11
     guarante
    0.11
    Activations Density 0.124%

    No Known Activations