© Neuronpedia 2026
    Privacy & TermsBlogGitHubSlackTwitterContact
    Neuronpedia logo - a computer chip with a rounded viewfinder border around it

    Neuronpedia

    Natural Language
    Autoencoders
    NEW
    Assistant AxisNEWCircuit TracerUPDATESteerSAE EvalsExportsAPI Community BlogPrivacy & TermsContact
    1. Home
    2. Gemma-3-27B-IT
    3. 16-GEMMASCOPE-2-TRANSCODER-262K
    4. 100088
    Prev
    Next
    INDEX
    Explanations

    `standards`, `Crist`, `United`, `checkered`, `testament`, `instruction`, `strategies`, `channel`, `questions`, `you` are often followed by specific details, categorizations, or expansions.Consider `standards you'll need`, `Cristofori ... Here's a breakdown`, `United States`, `checkered picnic blanket`, `testament to your hard work`, `instruction that describes a task`, `strategies, grouped by approach`, `channel states`, `questions that would be easily answered`, `you? Answer yes or no`.The `MAX_ACTIVATING_TOKENS` often introduce a specific item, category, or the subject of an explanation. The `TOKENS_AFTER_MAX_ACTIVATING_TOKEN` confirm this by showing the subsequent phrases that elaborate or specify.The pattern appears to be introducing a concept or entity and then providing details or context about it.Looking for a concise phrase (3-20 words).Keywords: introducing, detailing, specifying, elaborating, explaining."introducing specific concepts for elaboration" - 5 words."listing and detailing specific entities" - 5 words."introducing explanations for specific items" - 5 words."initiating specific descriptive sequences" - 4 words."introduces specific details or categories" - 5 words.Let's check the examples again:- `standards you'll need` -> standards introducing details- `Cristofori ... Here's a breakdown` -> Crist introducing breakdown- `United States` -> United introducing a specific country context- `checkered picnic blanket` -> checkered introducing visual details- `testament to your hard work` -> testament introducing elaboration on achievement- `instruction that describes a task` -> instruction introducing task description- `strategies, grouped by approach` -> strategies introducing grouping/categorization- `channel states` -> channel introducing state information- `questions that would be easily answered` -> questions introducing problem/solution context- `you? Answer yes or no` -> you introducing query for specific answerThe neuron seems to be firing when a word that is about to be followed by specific details, a definition, an example, or a structured piece of information appears. It flags the commencement of detailed exposition or categorization."introducing specific information or categories" - 5 words."specifying items followed by details" - 5 words."identifying elements followed by explanations" - 5 words.The core idea is *introducing* something that will then be *detailed*.Let's try to be more specific.The words themselves are often nouns or adjectives that are the subject or descriptor of a subsequent explanation."identifying a specific concept followed by its description" - 8 words."introducing distinct concepts for explanation" - 5 words."marking the start of item descriptions" - 5 words.Consider the `TOP_ACTIVE_LOGITS`:`warriors`, `GL`, `accompl`, `odor`, `animating`, `ANIEL`, `fome`, `encour`, `cited`, `ceremon`.These don't seem to provide a direct linguistic category.Let's focus on the structure: [Token] [Follow-up context].The neuron detects when a token is the 'subject' of a forthcoming explanation.If I had to pick a single word that captures the essence of introducing something to be specified or explained: "specify" or "detail" or "introduce"."introducing categories or specific items" - 5 words."introducing specific information" - 3 words. This is very short but might be too general."identifies specific items for elaboration" - 5 words.Let's re-evaluate: `standards`, `Crist`, `United`, `checkered`, `testament`, `instruction`, `strategies`, `channel`, `questions`, `you`.These are often anchors for definitions, examples, or next steps.It's like the neuron is pointing saying "This is important, and here comes more about it.""flags items for detailed explanation" - 5 words."introducing elements for context or definition" - 6 words."anchors for specific descriptive content" - 5 words.Given the examples:`standards you'll need`: standards -> specific requirements`Cristofori ... Here's a breakdown`: Crist -> introduce breakdown`United States`: United -> specific geographical scope`checkered picnic blanket`: checkered -> specific visual feature`testament to your hard work`: testament -> specific evidence of achievement`instruction that describes a task`: instruction -> specific task definition`strategies, grouped by approach`: strategies -> specific classification`channel states`: channel -> specific operational state`questions that would be easily answered`: questions -> specific informational gap`you? Answer yes or no`: you -> specific user query typeThe neuron detects words that are the *subject* of forthcoming detailed information, definitions, categorizations, or specific answers."identifying subjects of elaboration" - 4 words."introducing specific informational entries" - 4 words."marking items for specific context/details" - 6 words.What if the pattern is more about the *type* of information being introduced?Many are proper nouns or specific technical terms.`Crist` (proper noun)`United` (start of proper noun)`checkered` (specific descriptor)`testament` (specific concept)`instruction` (specific task definition)`strategies` (specific approach classification)`channel` (specific technical term)`questions` (specific interaction type)Let's try to combine these:"introducing specific concepts or entities" - 5 words."specific concepts/entities followed by details" - 6 words.Considering the length constraint (3-20 words)."introducing specific items for explanation" - 5 words."identifying subjects for detailed elaboration" - 5 words.The `TOKENS_AFTER_MAX_ACTIVATING_TOKEN` are crucial:`you` -> `tell` (command)`of` -> `States` (completing proper noun)`picnic` -> `blanket` (completing noun phrase)`to` -> `that` (conjunction introducing clause)`that` -> `,` (end of clause/phrase)`_` -> `that` (connector)`that` -> `tell` (function)`tell` -> `you` (direct object)This confirms that the initial token is often the root of a phrase or clause that provides more information.Let's go with something that emphasizes the introduction of a specific topic."introducing specific concepts or categories for elaboration" - 6 words."identifies core elements followed by details" - 6 words.Perhaps focusing on the *purpose* of finding the pattern:"introduces items requiring specific detail" - 5 words."flags terms introducing specific content" - 5 words.The most concise and accurate might be:"introducing specific concepts for explanation" - 5 words.Another option:"identifies subjects of detailed description" - 5 words.Let's look at the `TOP_POSITIVE_LOGITS` one last time:`warriors`, `GL`, `

    np_acts-logits-general · gemini-2.5-flash-lite
    New Auto-Interp
    Top Features by Cosine Similarity
    Configuration
    google/gemma-scope-2-27b-it/transcoder_all/layer_16_width_262k_l0_small_affine
    Prompts (Dashboard)
    238,145 prompts, 512 tokens each
    Dataset (Dashboard)
    lmsys + oasst1
    No Configuration Found
    Embeds
    IFrame
    Link
    Not in Any Lists

    No Comments

    Negative Logits
    ត
    0.50
     Dmitri
    0.49
    لت
    0.47
    ية
    0.46
     नस
    0.46
    𝙩
    0.45
    ניות
    0.45
     Tracker
    0.45
    ક
    0.45
    tracker
    0.44
    POSITIVE LOGITS
     warriors
    0.49
    GL
    0.48
     accompl
    0.47
     odor
    0.47
     animating
    0.47
    ANIEL
    0.46
     fome
    0.45
     encour
    0.45
     cited
    0.45
     ceremon
    0.45
    Activations Density 0.000%

    No Known Activations