INDEX
Explanations
instances of specific terminology and statistical concepts related to data and sequences
Preceding specific nouns
explanation based on the pattern of causation or conditionality. The words in LOGITS like "because," "only," "mainly" combined with the prepositions/conjunctions after the MAX_ACTIVATING_TOKENS (by, because, with, for, if) suggest the neuron is looking for reasons or conditions that lead to a specific outcome or classification. The MAX_ACTIVATING_TOKENS themselves are often specific entities or states.Possible patterns:- words followed by "because"- words indicating cause or condition- specific terms followed by justificationLet's look for a phrase that captures this. "because" and "if" are common in TOKENS_AFTER_MAX_ACTIVATING_TOKEN. "only" and "because" are in TOP_POSITIVE_LOGITS. This suggests a focus on "why" or "under what conditions"."because", "if", "by", "with" follow the max tokens."only", "because" are top logits.This neuron seems to activate when specific technical/legal/scientific terms are followed by words that explain their cause, condition, or justification.Consider the phrase: "terms with a cause or condition".Or: "specific technical terms explained" - too long."classification with reason" - good."specific terms with stated reason" - good."why [term]?"Let's try to extract a core idea.MAX_ACTIVATING_TOKENS are specific things/concepts (SNPs, argument, bribes, species, ranking, segregation, analysis, variable, justified, label, part, sequence).TOKENS_AFTER_MAX_ACTIVATING_TOKEN are functional words (by, because, with, for, if).TOP_POSITIVE_LOGITS are about singularity or reason (only, because, mainly).The neuron is likely firing for specific terms *when* a reason, cause, or condition is provided. Words like "because", "if", "by" are cues for this.The 'only' logits might be related to *how* a specific term is defined or used, emphasizing specificity or a unique reason.How about: "specific [term] plus reason/condition"?"specific terms explained by cause""terms following cause or condition"Let's re-examine some texts with the max tokens:- "seasonal SNPs **by** chromosome" -> SNP (term) + by (condition/method)- "‘particle’ label **because** of their characteristics" -> label (term) + because (reason)- "shooting is ruled to have been justified" -> justified (term) - this one doesn't have a following word from the list, but the word "explained" is part of the concept.- "random variable is a discrete random variable **if** for a set of finite or countably" -> variable (term) + if (condition)- "paid the bribes **through** an agent" -> bribes (term) + through (method)- "ionic species and BiTe^+^. The cesium forms that kind of ionic species **with** Te and Bi" -> species (term) + with (relation)- "earned its No. 5 ranking **by** making shots" -> ranking (term) + by (reason/method)- "a sequence... **if** and only **if**" -> sequence (term) + if (condition)- "targeted analysis **in** multiple cases" -> analysis (term) + in (context)- "disciplinary segregation **is** an inmate" -> segregation (term) + is (state) - this one is a definition.The pattern seems to be specific terms being defined, classified, qualified, or contextualized. The TOP_POSITIVE_LOGITS "only", "because", "mainly" suggest a focus on the *reason* or *specific condition* under which these terms apply.Let's consider "terms followed by explanation". Too vague."explanation for technical terms"."technical terms with justification"The key seems to be that the MAX_ACTIVATING_TOKENS are specific concepts, and they are often followed by words that *explain* or *qualify* them. The top logits reinforce the idea of "why" or "solely".Perhaps focusing on the *relationship* implied."terms and their conditions""terms and reasons""classification by reason"The phrase needs to be specific and avoid forbidden starters."terms followed by justification/reason" -> could be a good direction."reason for classification""condition for term"Let's try to be very direct. The neuron connects a term to its reason/condition.Looking at the logits again: "only", "because", "numai", "uniquement", "porque", "потому". These strongly suggest *reason* or *exclusivity*.Max activating tokens are nouns/adjectives representing entities or states.How about: "terms explained by cause or condition"?Length: 6 words.Covers the idea well because the MAX_ACTIVATING_TOKENS are the "terms" and "TOKENS_AFTER_MAX_ACTIVATING_TOKEN" often signify "cause or condition" (e.g., because, if, by), and "TOP_POSITIVE_LOGITS" reinforce "cause" ("because") or "exclusivity/specificity" ("only").Let's check against rules:- Concise (3-20 words): Yes (6 words).- Captures what neuron detects/predicts by finding patterns: Yes.- No forbidden starters: Yes.- No "tokens" or "patterns": Yes.- Specific: Yes, 'terms' and 'cause or condition' feels specific.- Majority match: Majority of texts seem to fit this.Consider alternatives:- "terms followed by reasons" (
New Auto-Interp
Negative Logits
SourceChecksum
-0.77
]<<"
-0.67
')(
-0.63
">//
-0.63
☸
-0.59
encodeWith
-0.59
fjspx
-0.57
存于互联网档案馆
-0.57
ERTA
-0.57
Vang
-0.56
POSITIVE LOGITS
only
0.82
because
0.75
потому
0.72
numai
0.58
ONLY
0.57
porque
0.57
only
0.56
uniquement
0.55
ONLY
0.54
mainly
0.54
Activations Density 1.134%